Digital cameras CAN see buried gold

Good morning room:  Mike, I liked that post, first time that I have seen it.  It tends to confirm what I have been saying in the past regarding  all objects, not just metal, modifying an incoming frequency to one that indicates their basic molecular structure.

In the case of Gold, the resulting modification of the basic light frequency is the one that our visual system interprets as the color Gold.

As for buried metals modifying another frequency, especially near to the visual one, it is completely in line with Mike's ' post.  It can  readily be shown that the penetration into the soil is dependent upon the transmitted frequency.

If one of the nearby frequencies of light  is capable of penetrating the ground, it naturally would be also modified by any metal that  it encounters and the resulting, exiting  frequency could be seen as a mist, cloud, or some other visual /electrical manifestation. 

The Ionic reaction of a chemical with metal would also produce the Colored light that is seen as a  fire / luminous gas. 

Since it has been proven that an infinite numbers of electrical potentials / currents are constantly circulating in the earth, it can be safely assumed that some of these too will be subject to modification and the resulting field possibly captured with the camera where it exits from the earth.

So get to experimenting with the cameras my friends, simple logic says that it is feasible.

Another thing, I noticed that it  has not been made it clear, since it keeps reoccurring,   Gold   'does'   disintegrate, but it does   'NOT'   Oxidize,   two different things that have consistently been misquoted / interpreted by the deniers as proof that no such action ever occurs in metal, buried or not.

Don Jose de La Mancha

I've not read here in a while... I know a few have been experimenting and testing...

Anyone find gold yet?

Nope.

I've not read here in a while... I know a few have been experimenting and testing...

Anyone find gold yet?

Nope.

Short of rereading every post - has anyone determined that the metals or gold actually are visibile via camera modifications?

I've not read here in a while... I know a few have been experimenting and testing...

Anyone find gold yet?

Nope.

Short of rereading every post - has anyone determined that the metals or gold actually are visibile via camera modifications?

Nope.

HI:  Finding this evidence on gold, or another metal, possibly imaging in a digital camera is exactly why this experimenting is being done.  If it was an accomplished fact,  the  final developer would most certainly be out in the field beating any possible competition.  

What we are doing in here is passing around information showing that it IS possible and logical, and ways to hopefully accomplish this.  We already know that the digital camera can record far beyond normal visual frequencies and into the IR ones as well.   There is no reason that it can't be modified in one way or another to venture even further into the metallic field's  frequencies, no matter which way they are.

What we still don't know, is if the metal must be in the earth fields or not to produce this harmonic.   It apparently does not work in the air, but then that may be due to our deficiencies in unconventional thinking so far, since it logically must be also  be, but of a weaker nature .

At the moment there are various geophysical instruments used in mining exploration which, to an extent, can tell what the ore body consists of.  There are handheld instruments which can tell roughly the concentration of certain elements in a core before splitting and sending it off to be assayed.  NI is an example.

Simple examples of seeing or recording non visual frequencies are the screen for detecting mercury in ores.  It is done by simply coating a flat screen with a fluorescent  materiel,  then placing the suspected mercury specimen in front of it.  By simply shining a  source of energy that will excite the fluorescent materiel,  it will clearly show the rising Mercury fumes by simple interference of the exciting light to the screen. You will see the evidence of Mercury by the fumes looking like a moving mist on the screen  - sound a bit familiar?

As for our friend swr, He couldn't work for one day, or even begin to calculate  electrical reactions without the use of many instruments which allow him to see and measure unseen frequencies from DC to hyper microwaves.  All are just as intangible as the reactions that you are attempting to locate or measure  with the camera.

To put it in a capsule, the world of Science is awash with similar instruments  that accomplish directly or indirectly what you are attempting to do here.  Why would this be an exception??

Get to cracking my friends.

Don Jose de La Mancha

I'm not trying to add fuel to this fire but I do have a couple observations.

First, the ability to duplicate this idea is limited by our knowledge of several things. Specifics on the internal filtering and design of the cameras, the local conditions at the time this occured such as barometric pressure, temperature, and humidity, and most important, soil conductivity. (wow, bad run on sentence)  Its like photographing kirlian auras, everything has to be perfect to get the picture to work out.

Second, biologists can show localized mineralization in plant matter through absorption from the soil and groundwater. This is proven. I believe several of the posts here reference this.

Third, all materials whether paramagnetic, diamagnetic, or non magnetic, are affected by the flow of electrons in magnetic and rf fields. Their classification is due to their magnetic response, not their electrostatic or chemical response.

What amazes me is that no one has looked into building a "gold only" or "silver only" spectral filter based on the unique absorption indexes of gold and silver. 

Personally, I look at this topic as a way to open my thoughts to new ideas. I would love to see a site through different spectrum just so I have some idea of something different. This could be an indication of either disturbed soil or mineralization. Different attracts my curiosity, something I hope will stand me well in cache seeking.

good morning MR:  Excellent post with interesting observations.  You are quite right on using certain plants to locate Precious metals. Many show traces of the metal upon being fire assayed.  It is absorbed in minute quantities into the tissues, so obviously the metal has to have been in a soluble state, possibly partly due to plant cyanide and it's action.

Silver is much more evident than Gold, yet Gold has also been identified with certain plants that have adapted  to it as part of their Physiology to the point that they are used as field locator's.

There is a new science being developed of viewing plant cover from a satelite to locate new micron sized deposits utilizing the plants to locate the fields.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 in dealing with the auras from gold and silver, i find this very interesting and would like to know about the cameras. my camera is the nikon 8 megapixil.will a camera with3 megapixils  be better?? i know midas said don't get hung up on cameras.what i would like to find out is the less pixils allowing in more or less ir if i have two pieces of exposed film on it or will the 8 pixils allow in more ir?? the camera deal sounds less tiring than the moonbeam system  to me. less mosquitos in the sunshine than in the moonshine..hh-----------tenclaw

HI Claw, my friend, you are obviously a rookie in this business, you 'always' take along a delectable female as diversionary bait for the skeeters,   a n d  if it doesn't payoff, the skeeters fed,  one can always go for a secondary objective .

Don Jose de La Mancha

"yet Gold has also been identified with certain plants that have adapted  to it as part of their Physiology to the point that they are used as field locator's "

Would you please name at least one  Sir. Really interested in this. This makes sense. Can you guide me to more information on this subject Real de Tayopa !!!

Victorio;

Here is just one, I recall reading about others which were either trees or bushes or both.

http://www.delange.org/DesertTrumpet/DesertTrumpet.htm

http://www.arizonagoldprospectors.com/Desert_Trumpet_Plant.htm

http://www.arizonaminingclaims.com/prospectingtips/prospectingtips.htm

Added note:  I think that with the others I read about, a color change when in certain types of mineralized soil was mentioned.

THANK YOU !!!

Midas Sir, Have you had any luck with the Newer Canon EOS 10 to 15 megapixles.

Dear Victorio;
Yes, the study of plant life in regards to locating possible lodes of precious metals is a very old study. In fact, I think it was the Jesuits whom first noticed that different flora species respond differently to different soil matrixes.

For example, when searching for gold deposits, the early Spanish prospectors would search for flora that resonded well in the presence of gold. Now, gold doesn't actually produce any noticeable difference in the surrounding soil matrix, however iron most certainly does and and this is why iron was often coined as "the mother of gold".

In other words, wherever there exists an area with a higher than normal iron content in the soil, the odds that gold may be located in the same zone increases dramatically.  Therefore, in order to locate the iron deposits one had to merely study which plant life thrives on soil with an enriched iron content and VOILA!

Once the prospector was able to determine that there was an iron deposit in the area, he then knew that there also existed a very high probability that gold would also be encountered.

This is known as an indirect method and it still works rather well, although it's slow and tedious and has since been superceded by all manner of electronic gadgetry.
Your friend;
LAMAR

Muchas Gracias Don Lamar. Very Helpful.

the attached picture was taken with a canon power shot without any ir filter at about 10am. i dnt know anything about photography. i would appreciate if anyone could explain this to me. what is this white thing in the middle?

yes, i was experimenting with ir about 5 months ago but i have long accepted defeat and buried the issue to rest...or so i thought.

with the attached picture, i think this 'ir thing' refuse to die a natural death...

my last posting was june 30. i shared a picture taken with a home made ir filter which i thought captured an aura of a buried gold treasure. unfortunately i was not able to duplicated the result after several tries with varying direction and time of day. 

that was 5 months ago and i have long since forgoten it until...yesterday, i was river trekking with several friends and took several picutures of the beautiful scenery using a canon powershot. you can guess how surprised i was when i downloaded the shot into my laptop. i almost fell on the floor  i was not looking for it and in fact it was taken without any ir filter but here it is!!!

is this an aura of a long buried gold treasure or what?



 

  hello searching; that pic sure looks like a good place to start with the deep seeker detectors. that is what i have heard people say the aura looks like at high tide and full moon. good luck and try that again.---tenclaw

Uranium deposits (as well as a few other associated Minerals) can sometimes put off enough radiative energy to be picked up by a digital cameras infrared spectrum.   I also know that silver can do some wonky things when exposed to certain wave lengths of radiation causing it to emit different forms of radiation as well.  I would thoroughly test any material found by this method to be safe...

good morning to all; i hope no one here will think that i am a negative cause i love all this back and forth talk about the treasure auras: real de tayopa said (in post #305 aug.02-2009) ''it apparently does not work in the air''---when i was in contact with louis matacia a few years back he sent me a picture of a gold nugget sitting on top of a stump and you could see the aura of it. he took the pic about 9 in the morning when the sun was almost level with the stump-(sun rays) was very beautiful. the aura was pulled in the direction of the sun.( no offence tayopa)--on another note, i have been practicing with my setup.i have gotten several pics of the aura of my gold coin buried about 3-4 inches deep.also a quart fruit jar full of silver plated spoons and forks has given a good aura.i am sending some pics to midas with permission to post if he wishes to. my camera is a nikon cool-pix 8 mp--filter is 3 layers of film glued to a plastic tube which fits on the lens. the film i use came from a 1986 infra red roll that was developed and naturally some did not come out and that is what i use.--if midas chooses not to post i will send film to someone else if they desire to post it..why don't i post them??? Do not know how! i have gimp on my computer but something always goes wrong for me..and yes to tayopa i am a novice treasure hunter.i was too busy chasing coins with my detector and had no good info on sign interpretations. do have good signs/marks though.. good week to everybody

the attached picture was taken with a canon power shot without any ir filter at about 10am. i dnt know anything about photography. i would appreciate if anyone could explain this to me. what is this white thing in the middle?

yes, i was experimenting with ir about 5 months ago but i have long accepted defeat and buried the issue to rest...or so i thought.

with the attached picture, i think this 'ir thing' refuse to die a natural death...

my last posting was june 30. i shared a picture taken with a home made ir filter which i thought captured an aura of a buried gold treasure. unfortunately i was not able to duplicated the result after several tries with varying direction and time of day. 

that was 5 months ago and i have long since forgoten it until...yesterday, i was river trekking with several friends and took several picutures of the beautiful scenery using a canon powershot. you can guess how surprised i was when i downloaded the shot into my laptop. i almost fell on the floor  i was not looking for it and in fact it was taken without any ir filter but here it is!!!

is this an aura of a long buried gold treasure or what?

I haven't seen a digital aura like that before but it looks remarkably like the auras from the Polaroid SX-70 camera.  I would check it out with a good metal detector.  BTW, what are those three strange figures in the river?

the attached picture was taken with a canon power shot without any ir filter at about 10am. i dnt know anything about photography. i would appreciate if anyone could explain this to me. what is this white thing in the middle?

yes, i was experimenting with ir about 5 months ago but i have long accepted defeat and buried the issue to rest...or so i thought.

with the attached picture, i think this 'ir thing' refuse to die a natural death...

my last posting was june 30. i shared a picture taken with a home made ir filter which i thought captured an aura of a buried gold treasure. unfortunately i was not able to duplicated the result after several tries with varying direction and time of day. 

that was 5 months ago and i have long since forgoten it until...yesterday, i was river trekking with several friends and took several picutures of the beautiful scenery using a canon powershot. you can guess how surprised i was when i downloaded the shot into my laptop. i almost fell on the floor  i was not looking for it and in fact it was taken without any ir filter but here it is!!!

is this an aura of a long buried gold treasure or what?

problem here most of the gold bar buried by the japanese were either put on a drum of oil with coal tar or the bar itself was painted with coaltar like a sticky black paint,even removing the coat from the bar is very hard maybe before the WW2 start the japanese has already do their homework on research about the precious metal that emit some sort of radiation or most what they call it "the Rays of the SUN"...........we could not see the RAYS of the SUN of it cover with Very Dark Clouds,just like the Aura of the Gold Bar. also in Shinto religion Gold is for EYES of GODs to see only(they paint the gold with black epoxy paint)and only BUDDHA is made of GOLD.



 

[/quote]

I haven't seen a digital aura like that before but it looks remarkably like the auras from the Polaroid SX-70 camera.  I would check it out with a good metal detector.  BTW, what are those three strange figures in the river?


[/quote]

midas,

thanks for the comment but isnt it just a lens flare cause by sun's deflection? but you are right a good metal detector capable of much depth will settle the issue. but getting that kind of detector is another story...

these figures are that of my friends....i did it to hide their identity.

searching

Look this kind of work: www.make-digital.com. Maybe are some of interest in this report.

bump   We find this plant , the Desert Trumpet Plant (Eriogonum Inflatum)

in areas in Arizona that we find gold.

Look this kind of work: www.make-digital.com. Maybe are some of interest in this report.

It's asking for a name and password.....

PLL

bump   We find this plant in areas in Arizona thet we find gold.

What is it?

bump   We find this plant in areas in Arizona thet we find gold.

What is it?

It is a Desert Trumpet Plant (Eriogonum Inflatum)

bump   We find this plant in areas in Arizona thet we find gold.

What is it?

It is a Desert Trumpet Plant (Eriogonum Inflatum)

I was out there a few years ago and I brought home a few seeds from a bush I liked. I'm not sure if it was that one, as it was blooming. I never got around to planting them, but they probably wouldn't have grown here anyway. Thanks.

Dear searching;
Your photo is a classic example of how not to take a photograph with a point & shoot camera, my friend. First, you have a very sunny day and water in the foreground with open shade in the background. The aura is nothing more mysterious than the reflection of the water being projected to aftmost lens element then being reflected forward. It did this several times therefore the aura is tall and thin. If the subject would have been in the middle of the the aura, then the shot would have been a complete loss, my friend.

In order to eliminate this effect, try moving several feet to the right and keep the area with the opened shade completely out of the frame or move into the open shade and take the shot from the shady area into the brightly lit area.
Your friend;
LAMAR

Good explication Lamar, logical deduction in my country we have a phrase: In the life not all shine is gold.

thanks fro the explanation, lamar.

Anyone find gold yet?

 

Any gold auras found with ditial pict?

Everyone seems to keep asking about the actual filters that the original poster was using and what techniques he used.  After a little research on "Ye Olde Google Machine".  I found that there is an ebook that is entirely devoted to the subject.  The website for the book is:
http://www.treasurehunterssecretmanual.com/
along with a youtube video.  I haven't bought it so I have no clue as to how helpful it is.  If anyone buys it, let me know if its worth the money or not. LOL
SynthetiX

Everyone seems to keep asking about the actual filters that the original poster was using and what techniques he used.  After a little research on "Ye Olde Google Machine".  I found that there is an ebook that is entirely devoted to the subject.  The website for the book is:
http://www.treasurehunterssecretmanual.com/
along with a youtube video.  I haven't bought it so I have no clue as to how helpful it is.  If anyone buys it, let me know if its worth the money or not. LOL
SynthetiX

I and others on this thread own that book. Save your money. The OP of this thread is the author of that publication

Marked.

Don Jose de La Mancha

I found articles on the web about modifying digital cameras to take IR pics by Googling digital cameras and IR pictures.  Or something similar.  One article contained pictures and told exactly HOW to do it yourself.  The cameras with fixed lens are the easiest to do because you don't have the telescoping lens mechanisms to fool with.  And you can use pieces of exposed 35mm film to make filter pieces to attach to the outside of the lens; as a lens cap.  The drawback of taking out the inside filters is that after that the camera is useable for IR only.  You can have the best of both worlds by just using the IR filter cap for the outside of the lens and not taking out the inside filters.  You'll want to use a tripod to make the IR pics because of longer exposure times needed. 

You can test your digital camera pretty fast by taking your TV remote control and point it straight into your camera's lens and press any button on the remote.  While doing this, have your monitor screen on and if the IR emitters of the remote light up like automobile headlights, then your camera can be use to take IR pics the slower way, without removing the inside filters.  Just make a IR lens cap to go onto the outside of the lens; and use a tripod to insure sharpness of the pics.  When you do this TV remote test, go ahead and take a picture of it to make sure the camera actually records the IR lights.  I did my test in a dark room and the only things that showed in the test pictures were the two bright IR bulbs.  Worked like a champ.

You can also convert those cheap webcams to "shoot" like a poorman's starlight scope for low light / no light shots.  That web article covered that, too.

lamar,

what do you think of this picture?

be glad to know your technical view about this picture.

thanks agian

lamar,

i dnt know if this is the right page to post this pic but i think you must try to help me with what my camera has pick up. i took this pic just outside the cave's entrance. this was taken last week and i just today notice this bright circle spot almost at the top portion of the picture. when i enlarge that portion i could see its like a solid ball of fire with flare on its perimeter.

thanks for taking the time.

lamar my friend,

i was fishing for a second opinion in the other page. now i know you are the MAN when it come to photography (did i hear any objection?)

i have another pic (below) by the river and the bamboo groove. is this the same story with previous pics?

thanks

what about this? an older picture taken by another person but on same area with my first posted pic...on the bamboo groove fronting the river...

Dear searching;
The last two photos that you've posted show an effect called refraction. Refraction occurs when the sun is above and either in, or out of the frame. This effect typically occurs on hazy days, with the haze either coming from moisture vapor in the air, dust particles or even smoke. The light from the sun attempts to pentrate the layer of haze and in doing so, the rays of light become refracted, that is to say that they split into the seven primary colors of the rainbow, which are red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet.

When a ray of light enters a media, such as a haze it's path tends to bend somewhat. It's this ending which causes the effect, my friend, because the red portion of the light ray bends at a lesser angle than the portions of the ray which are green and blue. The green portion bends at an almost constant angle, whereas the blue portion tends to bend at a greater angle than either the green or red portions.

Because of this light ray bending phenomenom, the light ray scatters into three separate beams of light, those being red, green and blue. The zone between the red and the green, and the zone between the green and the blue make up the other colors in the rainbow, those being orange, yellow, idigo and violet.

Also, inexpensive camera lens can greatly magnify this effect by further separating the individual light beams. This type of aberration is known as *chromatic aberration* and it cannot be easily resolved. Most generally, chromatic aberrations occur when a camera uses a single lens without the use of a secondary achromatic doublet lens, the purpose of it being to re-concentrate the separate light rays into one single coherent ray.

Many modern day upper end digital cameras such as the Panasonic Lumix cameras can automatically reduce or eliminate chromatic aberrations immediately after the photograph has been taken, however this technology is still rather new and therefore somewhat expensive. In digital photography, most lenses experience chromatic aberrations to one degree or other due to the digital sensors which are used. One of the most common chromatic aberrations is the dreaded *purple fringe* which occurs in areas where there exists a stark transition between light areas and dark ones.
Your friend;
LAMAR

Evening 10 claw my friend¨:  Apologies for being so tarde in answering your excellent post.  Frankly I missed it.  You posted -->

yes to tayopa i am a novice treasure hunter
========================

My reply was not intended to be a down play but part of a bit of humor regarding not taking a Delectable female with you  hehehe

Don Jose de La Mancha

 morning tayopa, i knew you were kidding. i never try to down anyone or 'rattle their nerves' except the big 3 on here that downs everything, and have'nt gone that direction but 2 times. i really enjoy your posts so you need to post more, o.k? folks that have been there and done that are very helpful to the younger ones. catch u later===tenclaw===

Before I forget, here are the latest of my pictures as promised.  They have not changed from the first pictures I took.  I am going to post them as unmodified except for image size so as not to bog down the tnet servers.

I made some enhancements to your pictures.

Here is an IR photo I took a few years ago.
I don't see any metal auras do you?
I still have the filters and cameras can easily take a shot and post it but need to know if there is anything special I need to try.

A very interesting read , thanks all.