All Is Quite On The Global Warming Front

Not even a peep.  What has happen to all the believers?  Too cold for them to post?

pinkcloud, get real you and i both know global warming causes severe weather changes, including severe warming and cooling. i do believe that you are representing a oil company or some other evil company with all your untruths.

Not even a peep.  What has happen to all the believers?  Too cold for them to post?

Its "quiet" by the way.

Sticks is using his "Carret" to cool thing off.

Well now.  Take your sweet little time, go through every post that I have ever made and then try to find that untrue statement.  Have fun. 

Nope, just like Shaun Hannity, Rush, Mark Levin and Glen Beck, the truth does me just fine. 
Now, just how many libs can you say that about?

LMAO

""DING DONG, DING DONG"" is that the doorbell?  no just stormcloud and his makebelieve friends.   lol

lots of thunder from that cloud but never any lightening

sticksboards: Instead of hurling insults and innuendo could you instead just let us know why the Global temperature has been on a decline since 1998 while global production of CO2 has gone up. A little science would be appreciated, not just declarative statements. Possibly we here know some things that you do not, or at least you have not botherd to find out the truth about.

  21stTNCav.  You may be in for a long wait for that reply.

Yeah, most likley a drive by poster. Not very nice.

top of page read

don't you ever watch the news
. read papers. or stay in contact with the outside world?
oh guess not

I do all of the above stick. Believe it or not I also surf the internet, or it that a little redundant?

try to convince any california fire fighter that global warming doesn't exist. good luck with that

Sticks, if you equate a forest fire to global warming then why even argue? I would point out the gaping holes it that logic but why? The concept is ridiculous. That is like saying if someone eats cheesecake they must be fat, or that if someone likes dogs they must like all animals. I suppose next you will say if we just had not produced so much carbon and raised the temperature we would not have had any fires. True faustinian logic.

oh i guess you didn't see the interview with the fire chief on the news, too bad you could have learned something.
SORRY

No, I did not see any interview with a fire chief on the news, but to say that Global Warming is causing fires in a area where mother nature has cleansed the environment for millions upon millions of years via fire is patently ridiculous.

let me know how your doing in another 10 years, untill then watch the news.  LMAO

Worst fires on record all happened over 100 years ago.  Facts not fiction.  Little stick, you may want to study the history of this great country before making silly statements.  But in your behalf, all the new history book have been written by liberal loons to downgrade the United States.

THUNDERCLOUD I SEE YOU DIDN'T WATCH THE NEWS EITHER,PAY ATTENTION NEXT TIME

Thank God for the Democratic Party to clean up the mess you guys wrent over the last 8 years, wrecked economy, everyone hates us, 2 unwinnable wars, shame of the world, deficit in the 10 figures......Good to be BACK!!! <a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/dZgoenIxNqo" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/dZgoenIxNqo</a>

Nice Techno crud. Would you like to do a little Mike Myers and "Touch my monkey" on this episode of Sprokits??? Look, if you cannot talk intelligently about the subject, why are you insisting on wasting our time??? Me, I am part of that Democratic party you love so much. Thanks. BTW, you ain't part of "us" let alone the US if your a Chech. Now please, this is not a political forum. Desist or watch it get pulled.

I'm an American. And no, the world does NOT revolve around the cabin of your pickup truck.

Yes, the world does evolve around my diesel bunin pickumup truck.

The one up on blocks in your front yard? I don't think it revolves very far then

Troll spray please!!!

Whatever, whatever. Let's just end this, where is some more information then? Debate, rather than hate.

No lets not end it, are you running out of your socialist programing retoric, got to try to use some critical thinking skills and not doing anygood huh?


To show how stupid it is for man to try to meddle in climate control/change Check this out:
It’s by credible sources!
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/sJh8I7R3q2Y" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/v/sJh8I7R3q2Y</a>
Hence the catch phrase “global warming” has been quietly replaced with “climate change” because they now see how stupid the whole thing is…and still want the funds to do “research” the money would be better spent feeding the hungry, starving people in the world, but not the lazy liberal elitist they do not know how to “work” just how to write grants and live off of tax payers.
Now for the big guns: Go here and get a real education! This will help you understand about the real facts and the lies concerned with warming/climate change.
 http://joannenova.com.au/global-warming/

Oh, yea as i mentioned in another post :

Socialism?   Well it’s great! .......Until you run out of everyone else’s money! Then what? I like this, it’s almost the quote Margaret Thatcher  who said “The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”

Now get this….the guy who was president of the American Socialist party (ran for the US presidency  6 times) closed down the party..why? He said that the Democratic Party had adopted every one of his tenants and beliefs…stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

Boy Curt, ya done it now. How dare you present logical fact and video supporting the reality of "I don't know" regarding MMGW. Barney Franks stwormtwoopers will be wisiting your whouse any dway now. Truthfully buddy, with me your preaching to the choir, but with these folks with their heads in the sand you might be talking to the wall. I did especially appreciate how the gentleman speaking in the video spoke on how much could be saved and therefore wasted on global hunger and malaria prevention if money those funds for Kyoto and cap and trade programs were used for climate adaption. I appreciate the presentation of these facts. I hope our fellow man will stop being lemmings and admit the truth.

Thanks 21st!

Here is another one that bites:


Here's an interesting read, important and verifiable information :

About 6 months ago, the writer was watching a news program on oil and one of the Forbes Bros. was the guest. The host said to Forbes, "I am going to ask you a direct question and I would like a direct answer;  hHow much oil does the  U.S.  have in the ground?"  Forbes did not miss a beat, he said, "more than all the  Middle East  put together." 

Please read below.

The U. S. Geological Service issued a report in April 2008 that only scientists and oil men knew was coming, but man was it big.  It was a revised report (hadn't been updated since 1995) on how much oil was in this area of the western 2/3 of North Dakota, western South Dakota, and extreme eastern Montana ...... check this out:

The Bakken is the largest domestic oil discovery since  Alaska 's  Prudhoe Bay , and has the potential to eliminate all American dependence on foreign oil. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates it at 503 billion barrels. Even if just 10% of the oil is recoverable... at $107 a barrel, we're looking at a resource base worth more than $5..3 trillion.

"When I first briefed legislators on this, you could practically see their jaws hit the floor. They had no idea.." says Terry Johnson, the Montana Legislature's financial analyst.

"This sizable find is now the highest-producing onshore oil field found in the past 56 years," reports The Pittsburgh Post Gazette.  It's a formation known as the  Williston   Basin , but is more commonly referred to as the 'Bakken.'  It stretches from Northern Montana, through  North Dakota and into  Canada .  For years,  U. S.  oil exploration has been considered a dead end.  Even the 'Big Oil' companies gave up searching for major oil wells decades ago. However, a recent technological breakthrough has opened up the Bakken's massive reserves.... and we now have access of up to 500 billion barrels.  And because this is light, sweet oil, those billions of barrels will cost Americans just $16 PER BARREL!

That's enough crude to fully fuel the American economy for 2041 years straight.  And if THAT didn't throw you on the floor, then this next one should - because it's from 2006!

U. S. Oil Discovery- Largest Reserve in the World

Stansberry Report Online - 4/20/2006

Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the  Rocky Mountains  lies the largest untapped oil reserve in the world. It is more than 2 TRILLION barrels.  On August 8, 2005 President Bush mandated its extraction. In three and a half years of high oil prices none has been extracted. With this motherload of oil why are we still fighting over off-shore drilling?

They reported this stunning news:  We have more oil inside our borders, than all the other proven reserves on earth. Here are the official estimates:

- 8-times as much oil as  Saudi Arabia

- 18-times as much oil as  Iraq

- 21-times as much oil as  Kuwait

- 22-times as much oil as  Iran

- 500-times as much oil as  Yemen

- and it's all right here in the  Western United States  .

HOW can this BE? HOW can we NOT BE extracting this? Because the environmentalists and others have blocked all efforts to help  America  become independent of foreign oil! Again, we are letting a small group of people dictate our lives and our economy.....WHY?

James Bartis, lead researcher with the study says we've got more oil in this very compact area than the entire Middle East -more than 2 TRILLION barrels untapped.  That's more than all the proven oil reserves of crude oil in the world today, reports The Denver Post.

Don't think 'OPEC' will drop its price - even with this find?  Think again!  It's all about the competitive marketplace, - it has to. Think OPEC just might be funding the environmentalists?

Pass this along.

You can check out this information at the link below!!!

GOOGLE it, or follow this link.

http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911

Time-Out !

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html

Arrrrrrrg!!!!! Does not compute! Too much logic, overloading circuts, neurons burning out. Must find plausible denial to buffer from overload of factual information. Must find mindless retort to fend off the truth,.......

"Hey, you deniers of MMGW out there, whats gonna happen it your wrong huh??? What then you - WORD REMOVED - Some people (parents of hadicapped children for example) find this word offensive.  Please don't use denigrating terms here at TreasureNet.  Thanks.s?"

Ahhhhh, overload returning to normal. Slight wiff of ozone, minimal amount of neurons destroyed. That was close.

(Anyone wanna see my other impersonation of a mindless herd dweller??? )

The US navy is full steam ahead in the Arctic ; shortly without the use of icebreakers
as global warming takes hold.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/20/2749007.htm

A spokesman for the Navy said :
"It makes me uneasy anyway to think that we're going to let a trend caused by global warming - the melting of the ice - allow us to explore and exploit more fossil fuels, which led to the warming in the first place."

The US navy is full steam ahead in the Arctic ; shortly without the use of icebreakers
as global warming takes hold.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/20/2749007.htm

A spokesman for the Navy said :
"It makes me uneasy anyway to think that we're going to let a trend caused by global warming - the melting of the ice - allow us to explore and exploit more fossil fuels, which led to the warming in the first place."

How many times are you going to post this without posting about the situation at the South pole??

Get him 21st.  That old boy thinks posting a half golly-whopper is gonna make us all set up and pay heed.  Nope, just ain't gonna happen.

The US navy is full steam ahead in the Arctic ; shortly without the use of icebreakers
as global warming takes hold.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/20/2749007.htm

A spokesman for the Navy said :
"It makes me uneasy anyway to think that we're going to let a trend caused by global warming - the melting of the ice - allow us to explore and exploit more fossil fuels, which led to the warming in the first place."

How many times are you going to post this without posting about the situation at the South pole??

The story was about the Arctic, so reference to the Antarctic is not meaningful here ,
except in so far as to show your poor knowledge of earth facts.
The Antarctic is colder than the Arctic.
From Wiki,
"Antarctica is colder than the Arctic for two reasons. First, much of the continent is more than 3 kilometres (2 mi) above sea level, and temperature decreases with elevation. Second, the Arctic Ocean covers the north polar zone: the ocean's relative warmth is transferred through the icepack and prevents temperatures in the Arctic regions from reaching the extremes typical of the land surface of Antarctica"

The Arctic melting is just a forcast of what the Antarctic will do in the future.

The US navy is full steam ahead in the Arctic ; shortly without the use of icebreakers
as global warming takes hold.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/20/2749007.htm

A spokesman for the Navy said :
"It makes me uneasy anyway to think that we're going to let a trend caused by global warming - the melting of the ice - allow us to explore and exploit more fossil fuels, which led to the warming in the first place."

How many times are you going to post this without posting about the situation at the South pole??

The story was about the Arctic, so reference to the Antarctic is not meaningful here ,
except in so far as to show your poor knowledge of earth facts.
The Antarctic is colder than the Arctic.
From Wiki,
"Antarctica is colder than the Arctic for two reasons. First, much of the continent is more than 3 kilometres (2 mi) above sea level, and temperature decreases with elevation. Second, the Arctic Ocean covers the north polar zone: the ocean's relative warmth is transferred through the icepack and prevents temperatures in the Arctic regions from reaching the extremes typical of the land surface of Antarctica"

The Arctic melting is just a forcast of what the Antarctic will do in the future.

Not a scientifically valid explaination. The Arctic did not act as the Antarctic did before it started melting. An increase in ice cannot be explained just by " it is colder and more severe weather wise". The tempature must be lower than it was previously for additional ice to be formed.    I don't think you get it.