TreasureNet - The Original Treasure Hunting Website! White's Metal Detectors - See What's In The Ground Before You Dig! Western & Eastern Treasures Magazine! J.W. Fisher's Underwater Search Equipment Kellyco Metal Detectors! Sedwick Treasure Auctions Opal Auctions!
 
J.W. Fishers
Previous Member Finds! Recent Treasures Found By TreasureNet Members! Control the images you see!
1786 Vermont Baby head Jewelery Cache Found !! 1828 CAPPED BUST Saxon Silver Sceat Clovis flintlock Pocket Pistol SERVANT SLAVE TAG Found GOLD in the BRADSHAWS MILTIA BELT PLATE Japanese Imperial Navy Bombardment Badge
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Down
  Bookmark This! | Print  
Author
Gravedigger Max, Scoop Question. (Read 311 times)
*United StatesOffline
Posts: 66
Coastal North Cackylacki
Detector used:
Excalibur 1000/ Nautilus DMC IIB/CZ-6a/ Tejon

Posted Nov 06, 2009, 08:10:41 AM
 Max,
 Between the Sunspot and SnS (Prost0ck) scoops you tested,which Brand and size would you prefer for mostly wet sand and some water?  Which is lightest and by how much? Any other insights?
 Thanks in advance,
Next time you plan on heading down to the Outer Banks, drop me a line.

Parkerized
*Offline
Posts: 909
va beach, va
  • Awards This member did something good! (such as returned a lost item!)

  • Reply To This Topic #1 Posted Nov 06, 2009, 11:53:21 AM
    i went with the smaller of the two with the small square holes

    works great in the water and damp zone and it was lighter

    the bigger model was just toooo heavy for damp and shallow, but god did it ever work good in the waist to chest deep zone.

    eliminated the floating sifter for me.......when we worked on the bay, but i will say some of my upcoming roadtrips will require a floating sifter and this scoop.

    chucks scoop is a great scoop also, but i found it to be a might heavy, but has a great foot pad assembly.

    i think don dodson with northgeorgia relics is or will be carrying the SnS scoops also.

    max

    * SNS SM. WEIGHT.jpg (67.78 KB, 640x480 - viewed 216 times.)

    * TUFF4.jpg (54.39 KB, 458x343 - viewed 216 times.)

    * TUFFCOMBO.jpg (50.33 KB, 458x343 - viewed 215 times.)
    Director-Search & Recovery Team
    *United StatesOffline
    Posts: 6282
    Somewhere in the waters of Michigan now.
    Detector used:
    Excal 1000, Sovereign GT, CZ20, Tiger Shark, GTI 1500, PI Pro, CZ6a, DFX, many more.

    Reply To This Topic #2 Posted Nov 06, 2009, 02:17:53 PM
    Max, that is a good set of pictures to compare the two scoops and sizes.  I am thinking the smaller scoop would do fine for me also for the areas I hunt.  If I was scooping shells again I would like the larger one.  Like everything else, there is no best one for everyone for all areas. thumbsup

    (C) Sandman256, 2008. All Rights Reserved.
    "TIME IS THE ONLY THING YOU NEVER GET BACK, WHY WASTE IT SWINGING A DETECTOR THAT ISN'T UP TO THE TASK."
    ******************* WHAT YOU DO WITH THE FINDS YOU DIG UP IS YOUR BUSINESS AND NO ONE ELSES, IGNORE ANYONE ON A SOAPBOX TRYING TO PREACH OTHERWISE! *******************
    *United StatesOffline
    Posts: 4308
    Orlando, Fl
    Detector used:
    Minelab_Excal_1500_WOT Excal_1200_S-12 Waterproof_ Sov_GT Sovereign GT Whites_6000_XL_Pro Whites_Classic_ID Troy_Shadow_X2 Tesoro_Conquistador Fisher_1235X Whites_Beach_Hunter_ID

    Reply To This Topic #3 Posted Nov 06, 2009, 04:11:32 PM
    Max, thats not bad for weight, my Beach Brute II weighs about 5.7 pounds itself when you add the Pro Handle to help lift it. (I highly recommend the Pro Handle by the way)

    I will admit I like yours, I like the biggest scoop I can have when im in the water waist to chest deep as well, recover that target as quick as possible before the next breaker rolls in. icon_thumright








    All posts begin with "In my opinion"
    *United StatesOffline
    Posts: 21

    Reply To This Topic #4 Posted Nov 06, 2009, 04:34:55 PM
    Max,
     The smaller one is my favorite too, for most but not all situations. I am out here doing lakes and rivers on Washington. I just got another new scoop from a new maker this past week. It is great in the rocks! 5.5 inches wide, 5 inches tall and 8 inches long! It is the best in the rocks!

    Kind regards,
    Steve

    i went with the smaller of the two with the small square holes

    works great in the water and damp zone and it was lighter

    the bigger model was just toooo heavy for damp and shallow, but god did it ever work good in the waist to chest deep zone.

    eliminated the floating sifter for me.......when we worked on the bay, but i will say some of my upcoming roadtrips will require a floating sifter and this scoop.

    chucks scoop is a great scoop also, but i found it to be a might heavy, but has a great foot pad assembly.

    i think don dodson with northgeorgia relics is or will be carrying the SnS scoops also.

    max
    *United StatesOffline
    Posts: 66
    Coastal North Cackylacki
    Detector used:
    Excalibur 1000/ Nautilus DMC IIB/CZ-6a/ Tejon

    Reply To This Topic #5 Posted Nov 08, 2009, 08:15:34 PM
    Thanks.
    Tags: Gravedigger Max scoop Question. 
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
      Bookmark This! | Print  
     


    RECENTLY FEATURED W&ET ARTICLES...
    feature article feature article feature article feature article feature article feature article feature article
    Copyright 1994-2010 TreasureNet (tm) All Rights Reserved.
    Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
    SimplePortal 2.2.2 © 2008-2009

    Treasure Hunting By State Treasure Hunting By Country Treasure Auctions D



    TERMS OF USE

    TOP


    Google visited this page Nov 29, 2009, 09:19:36 AM