Stefen I looked up the article rather than just replying to something blindly. In the article there is a photograph of the hydrant it is contained in the homeowners garden and is what I would call art.
The city worker should have tested the fire hydrant prior to painting nothing to it I have done it hundreds of times as a road construction worker. The city worker was considering running pipe to the hydrant?


No wonder the government can't make it on the taxes we give them they have shxt for brains running things. Sure he probably would not have gotten so far as laying pipe bc he would need a permit. But you never know he might have pull and go outside the normal realm and do things his way and cost the tax payers a few thousand dollars due to a lack of communication and an inability to distinguish the difference between art and public works.
If you had a bad rating on your fire insurance just buy an old hydrant place it where you think it will help and hope the government might come along and provide service to it and improve your rating.